The Friar’s Lantern is written in an interactive format where
the reader is able to choose the next step in which the book will advance. The
genre is intertwined with a behavioral science participant who is a juror in a crime
drama trial.
There is a question I would like to put in the forefront. Why
is there an option if, in some instances, the conclusion is the same? The
narration and descriptions are heavy and at times a little excessive but
definitely gives influential visual and clear pictures of your surroundings.
Reading through this story was a little difficult for me
because there were quite a few ambiguous words that I did not understand.
Therefore, I was constantly looking up definitions, which put a damper in the
beginning two chapters. For example, I looked up ‘extrapolation’ and it is
not a word.
The book did however achieve its goal, but could place
interactive options in a few better places. The content is interesting along
with its concluding chapter that is convincing.
Overall, this is a good story with a nice approach to the
intermingling of the court trial and I do recommend you take the time to read
it. Those interested in crime dramas and behavioral science drama would love
this story.
I received this book from the author in exchange for an honest
review in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission Guidelines.
No comments:
Post a Comment